ASU Home
ASU A-Z Index
My ASU
Colleges & Schools
Law Directory
Map
Search
:
News & Events
/
Law Library
/
Administration
/
Current Students
/
Prospective Students
Admissions
Centers & Programs
Faculty
Career Services
Alumni and Friends
Support ASU Law
Center for Law, Science & Innovation
News & Events
About the Center
Core Programs
Program on Governance of Emerging Technologies
Program on Personalized Medicine, Law & Policy
Public Health Law and Policy Program
Program on Law and Sustainability
Program on Information & Communications Technology
Innovation Advancement Program
Special Projects
Focus Areas
Intellectual Property Law Program
Nanotechnology Law Program
Program on Standards
Genetics and the Law Program
Lisa Foundation Patent Law Clinic
Law and Psychology
Program on the Future of the Forensic Sciences
Representative Publications
eDiscovery Program
Our People
student opportunities
Prescience - LSI newsletter
Past Conferences and Events
Home
Representative Publications
Saks,
Forensic Identification: From a Faith-Based "Science" to a Scientific Science,
201
Forensic Sci. Int'l 14 (2010)
Faigman, Saks, Sanders & Cheng, eds.,
Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony (West Publishing Co.) (Five volumes) (2010)
Including:
Saks,
Scientific Method: The Logic of Drawing Inferences from Empirical Evidence
Saks,
Ethical Standards of and Concerning Expert Witnesses
Sanders, Saks & Schweitzer,
Trial Factfinders and Expert Evidence
McQuiston & Saks,
The Testimony of Forensic Identification Science: What Expert Witnesses Say and What Factfinders Hear,
33 Law & Human Behavior 436-453 (2009)
Saks,
The Past and Future of Forensic Science and the Courts
, 93
Judicature 94 (2009).
Schweitzer & Saks,
The Gatekeeper Effect: Judges' Influence on the Persuasiveness of Expert Testimony,
15 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law1 (2009)
McQuiston & Saks,
Communicating Opinion Evidence in the Forensic Identification Sciences:
Accuracy and Impact
,
59 Hastings L. J. 1159 (Symposium: The Faces of Forensics: Identification and Behavior) (2008)
Saks,
Protecting Factfinders from Being Overly Misled, While Still Admitting Weakly Supported Forensic Science into Evidence
,
43 Tulsa L. Rev. 609 (Symposium:
Daubert
, Innocence and the Future of Forensic Science) (2008)
Saks & Faigman,
Failed Forensics: How Forensic Science Lost Its Way and How it Might Yet Find it
,
4 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 149-171 (2008)
Saks & Koehler,
The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science
,
61 Vanderbilt L. Rev. 199 (2008)
Saks,
Remediating Forensic Science
,
48 Jurimetrics J. 119 (2007)
Schweitzer & Saks,
The "CSI Effect": Popular Fiction about Forensic Science Affects the Public's Expectations about Real Forensic Science,
47 Jurimetrics Journal 357 (2007).
Moriarty & Saks,
Forensic Science: Grand Goals, Tragic Flaws, and Judicial Gatekeeping
, 44
Judges Journal 16 (Fall, 2005).
Saks & Koehler,
The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science
,
309 Science 892 (2005).
Saks, Faigman, Kaye & Sanders,
Annotated Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence - Second (West) (2005).
Saks & VanderHaar,
On the “General Acceptance” of Handwriting Identification Principles
, 50
Journal of Forensic Sciences 119 (2005)
Risinger & Saks,
Litigation-Directed Research in the Criminal Justice System
, XX
Issues in Science and Technology 35 (Fall, 2003).
Risinger, Saks, Rosenthal & Thompson,
The
Daubert/Kumho
Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion
, 90
U. Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
Phillips, Saks & Peterson,
Signal Detection Theory and Decision-making in Forensic Science,
46
Journal of Forensic Sciences 294 (2001)
Saks,
The Aftermath of
Daubert
: An Evolving Jurisprudence of Expert Evidence
, 40
Jurimetrics Journal 229 (2000)
Saks, M.J.
Merlin and Solomon: Lessons from the Law's Formative Encounters with Forensic Identification Science
, 49
Hastings Law Journal 1069 (1998)
Under Review
Schweitzer, Saks, Murphy, Roskies, Sinnott-Armstrong, Gulley,
The Impact of Neuroimages on Juror Decision-making
Schweitzer & Saks,
Juries' Understanding of Scientific Causation
Saks & Neufeld,
Parallel Evolution in Law and Science: The Structure of Decision-making Under Uncertainty